View Full Version : Increased number of posts per thread
Robert
July 14th, 2008, 09:45 AM
Today I changed the number of posts needed in a thread before another page is created. It was 10 before, now it is 20.
This means you get more scrolling in thread, but fewer pages to go through.
Which is better?
duhvoodooman
July 14th, 2008, 10:41 AM
20 sounds good. Agree that 10 is too few.
just strum
July 14th, 2008, 11:02 AM
Scrolling is good - it strengthens the picking fingers.
warren0728
July 14th, 2008, 11:29 AM
20 at least! i hate jumping to a new page! :thwap:
ww
Rocket
July 14th, 2008, 11:38 AM
Add poll option: "Doesn't matter"
sunvalleylaw
July 14th, 2008, 12:00 PM
Don't matter much to me. I'd read anyway.
Spudman
July 14th, 2008, 12:03 PM
I actually prefer 17 per page but if you have to go to 20 then I'm OK with that.:whatever:
just strum
July 14th, 2008, 12:07 PM
I actually prefer 17 per page but if you have to go to 20 then I'm OK with that.:whatever:
If we can choose other than what is listed - I would prefer to scroll left to right.
Rocket
July 14th, 2008, 12:34 PM
I'd actually prefer newest first... for some reason that makes more sense to me.
just strum
July 14th, 2008, 01:31 PM
I'd actually prefer newest first... for some reason that makes more sense to me.
+1
R_of_G
July 14th, 2008, 03:07 PM
I like the higher post count per page Robert.:AOK:
I'd rather scroll up and down one long page than go through multiple pages.
I'd prob set it at 19 myself, but I'm a Dark Tower junkie and that number has become an obsession.
ted s
July 14th, 2008, 04:15 PM
20 sounds good, but can we have the first one in the middle and the odd numbered posted north of the middle and the even numbered posts to the south ?
Robert
July 14th, 2008, 04:37 PM
20 sounds good, but can we have the first one in the middle and the odd numbered posted north of the middle and the even numbered posts to the south ?
What? :confused:
No, but I can send someone over to give you a good spanking!
sunvalleylaw
July 14th, 2008, 04:45 PM
What? :confused:
No, but I can send someone over to give you a good spanking!
and me!
DtcSYPjJbgg
(slight sexual humor, and the word sh*t, careful clicking if offended by such. :pancake: )
just strum
July 14th, 2008, 04:52 PM
20 sounds good, but can we have the first one in the middle and the odd numbered posted north of the middle and the even numbered posts to the south ?
Sounds reasonable.
Can we have a currency converter and a metric converter added to the site. How about $0.10 off a gallon of gas for every post. Do the grocery stores up there offer that? Where we shop we get something like $0.10 off for every $50 of groceries we buy. That's when having a 16 year old and an 18 year old in the house pays off.
I know, off topic. - oh well, shoot me.
sunvalleylaw
July 14th, 2008, 04:54 PM
Nope, the only punishment here in Castle Anthrax is spanking.
marnold
July 14th, 2008, 06:16 PM
I think that upping the limit to 20 shows a clear metric-centric bias. We should set it to a more logical number, like say 32. Or, even better, 42.
warren0728
July 14th, 2008, 06:45 PM
20 sounds good, but can we have the first one in the middle and the odd numbered posted north of the middle and the even numbered posts to the south ?
but only on odd numbered days...on even number days it should be just the opposite!
ww
just strum
July 14th, 2008, 06:54 PM
Well the group has been polled (that doesn't look right) - ouch, that sounds painful.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.