Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: What is good music according to Iggy Pop. Does it have to have technical merit?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sun Valley, Idaho
    Posts
    10,955
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default What is good music according to Iggy Pop. Does it have to have technical merit?

    Iggy Pop doesn't think so. Nor do I. To me, the key element is does the vocal or guitar, etc. move me. Iggy takes that thought pretty far. I am not a huge IP and the Stooges fan, (though I do have and enjoy some), but I think his points are interesting and thought provoking, and I do largely agree with him.

    Check out this interview on NPR. Click on the button at the top to listen. It is better than just reading it.

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...87&sc=fb&cc=fp

    He totally takes on the British musicians of his day: "People tend to jump on the bandwagon, and the bandwagon at that time was dumb members of the British yob class growing their hair and butchering the American blues," he says. "It was very important what not to do. [Music] has to get up off the couch, walk around and be original." He also hammers "quasi classical adaptations of Prog rock, bleeehhh!" The article makes the point that Iggy used his somewhat limited voice almost as a weapon, to move and provoke, and that it still to this day has merit.

    So what do you guys think? How important is the technical merit to you? My opinion? I am certainly not anti-technical merit, but if it isn't moving to me, I am moving on.
    Steve Thompson
    Sun Valley, Idaho


    Guitars: Fender 60th Anniversary Std. Strat, Squier CVC Tele Hagstrom Viking Semi-hollow, Joshua beach guitar, Martin SPD-16TR Dreadnought
    Amphs: Peavey Classic 30, '61 Fender Concert
    Effects and such: Boss: DS-1, CE-5, NS-2 and RC20XL looper, Digitech Bad Monkey, Korg AX1G Multi-effects, Berhinger: TU100 tuner, PB100 Clean Boost, Line 6 Toneport UX2, Electro Harmonix Little Big Muff Pi, DuhVoodooMan's Rabid Rodent Rat Clone, Zonkin Yellow Screamer Mk. II, MXR Carbon Copy Delay


    love is the answer, at least for most of the questions in my heart. . .
    - j. johnson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think it is very simple - if you like it, it's good for you, and that's all that matters. Who cares what others think?

    Technical merit? Can be cool and inspiring and all that, but to me, it has nothing to do with it being good or not.

    I still like listening to Yngwie once in a while, so I think that is good! (in small amounts) and I don't care what others think about that.
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Idaho (I-duh-ho)
    Posts
    12,581
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Good is always going to be a relative thing. Technical merit is also relative.

    Who is to define the term technical? Yngwie may seem technical but so is Johnny Ramone. They are both technical yet Yngwie may be perceived by some as being more technical yet the rhythmic barrage Johnny put out could also be considered technical. However, those two music styles differ greatly but are both technical. You can't have music without technical. It's math, emotion, time and emptiness.

    Music after all is a collection of frequencies and time and space. Those ingredients affect other universal matter relative to the frequency, space and time. It wont always have the same affect due to variables yet there will be some effect after the cause. It's all technical. Music can't exist without "technical." Since the effect is variable how do you define good?

    So really, who or what is merit connected to? Who assigns merit? It can only be from the observer's perception of course.

    In any case I don't think it's possible to have music without "technical." There is too much involved to leave technical out. So it all has technical merit.

    "No Tele For you." - The Tele Nazi

    Ha! Tele-ish now inbound.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    601
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Spot the pertinent sentence...

    Ig's a dbl. edged sword. No denying his legend, which is way more than most today even know, but he's been so full of himself that he can't put together a good album anymore, they've all been crap since the 70s. And lately he's dredged up The Stooges, why, who knows, but at least the Asheton's and James Williamson did get their late news kicks in and made some $$.

    Being a big fan of dummy rock from the Elvis/surf eras myself, the tech side was left long ago for those who need that (even tho I still crave my occassional King Crimson/Miles whackouts), and the more base instincts have proven to be the long run winners. Caveman rock is just more fun.
    Everybody sites The Stooges and The Velvet Underground as being uber-influencial, when in fact nobody at the time cared about them at all. It's all way after the fact that these bands have struck a nerve and recieved recognition for their efforts back when they were just big kids making noise that still sounds good today.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Takoma Park, MD
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ig's a dbl. edged sword. No denying his legend, which is way more than most today even know, but he's been so full of himself that he can't put together a good album anymore, they've all been crap since the 70s.
    As opposed to the Rolling Stones or Clapton, eh?

    Man, at the beginning of that piece when they play the intro to "Search and Destroy," I could feel my pulse kicking up a little.
    "When I play, I express my feelings very fast." -Yomo Toro

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't concern myself with technical merit. Since I am not musically technical, the only way I know technical merit is if someone points it out to me. There are songs that grab me for the beat, some for the lyrics, and some for no other explained reason except for I like it.

    As for groups like Stooges, Velvet Underground, Ramones and others not being popular in their early days, I don't agree. They did not enjoy the popularity of groups like Bruce Springsteen, but had a big following in areas that welcomed alternative music. At the time Cleveland was such a city and the people that I associated with were well aware of their music.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,515
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't get it, what is technical merit?
    _____

    GUITARS - Carvin DC127M - Carvin Bolt kit
    AMPS - Bogner Alchemist 112 - Blackheart Handsome Devil half stack
    FXs - Roger Linn Adrenalinn III - Boss GT-10
    _____

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    All over Texas...
    Posts
    4,071
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Uhhh, no, music doesn't have to have "technical merit" to be good. However, music that is complex that does have technical merit shouldn't be discounted because it's complex.
    Guitars:
    Fender 2006 MIM Fender Stratocaster HSS in 3TS
    Ibanez RG 570 with a bridge Invader
    ESP M II Deluxe with a Tune-o-Matic bridge
    Eleanor, the magical, mystical Road Worn wonder Tele
    Blackstar HT Club 40

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •