Where does guitar improvisation come from?

[rcwilk]

Hi,

This question is partially about theory and practice, but more about history. But it isn't about "It comes from the heart." My question lies in another register:

That is, historically, how did improvisation evolve as something akin to the guitar? Is there something about the guitar as an instrument (physically or culturally) that lends itself to improv?

For my own view at this point (not particularly informed, just opinion) it appears that old blues players in the delta needed to expand the time of any single song, and I get this to some degree. Maybe we can call that the 'expansion' theory and see it as a contribution, but I would like to bracket it out, positing that the time could have been filled with repetitions or gone nordic and filled with long stories. Instead, something else emerged.

Clearly in Chicago blues there is almost a formula that rock picked up, and the solo (improv or fake improve, depending...) became a part of many live performances and many recorded sessions. There even seems to be a valorization of improv and long solos that mark authentic music from pop music (at least in the minds of those into improv) are part of this.

There seems to be some randomness and chance involved as well. Richie Havens was asked to keep going at Woodstock because the other bands weren't set up and ready - and the never ending Freedom, Freedom became a 'thing'.

This all came up for me as I was reading Clapton's autobiography yesterday. He was talking about how they ran out of songs and so they just started jamming and the crowd went wild. Later, upon visiting (don't call it) Frisco during the Fillmore/Psychedelic years, Clapton noticed that the band could improvise and kind of "plug into" the crowd. Perhaps that takes substances were everyone becomes ONE anyway, but it interested me in terms of the feed-back aspect of improvisation, and how that works or doesn't. Everyone in SanFrancisco seemed to be plugged into jamming in those days, improv that would go on and on, and surely there is a florescence of improv during that time.

Now, less so. Is improv and jamming fading? I hear a joke (I hate) that says, Q: how is a rock solo like a premature ejaculatory? A: You know it's coming and there isn't anything you can do about it.
Is this the current attitude? Get the song out under 3 minutes and move on?

Sorry, digressing - I'm not here to bang new music. Though I did notice in Amsterdam last summer that the "Coffee shops" are not playing songs with long extended jams anymore. They are playing non-ending electronic stuff, so I can't quite get my theory about substances and improv to work..ha ha, it's not 3 minute pop songs, so maybe the theory still holds.

I saw an ethnology video once about Kalahari Kung! Bushmen. They dance and dance until they achieve a higher level. I think this has something to do with it, but then so would rave repetitiveness, and that is sort of what I am NOT getting at. Rather I think there is an kind of circulambulation, a kind of poetic interweaving, (impleaching) and interlacing over this repetition that respects it, but traces out themes...

Just a theory, curious about what other guitar lovers think and do,

RC

[marnold***]

Excellent question. I'm not sure if I've got an answer either, if for no other reason because I've never really studied it. I've been around enough people with innate musical ability that they can pretty much just play without really understanding how (or understanding why us normal folks can't understand it). You can certainly learn to do it, but some people just can.

[Robert****]

My answer is, we get bored playing chords so we want stretch out a bit and improvise solo lines. Like the cool dudes with horn and piano and reed instruments did some 100+ years ago.

[R_of_G]

That is, historically, how did improvisation evolve as something akin to the guitar? Is there something about the guitar as an instrument (physically or culturally) that lends itself to improv?

I'd contend that improvisation didn't evolve as something akin to the guitar. It existed long prior to the guitar. Guitarists certainly helped expand the techniques/traditions etc. but I don't think guitar improv exists outside the tradition of other improvised music.

Also, not to be the guy that debates everything you said, but I also disagree as to whether improvised music/jamming is occurring less frequently today than the 60s. In "popular music" for sure, but it's difficult to suggest that term meant the same thing in 1968 that it does now. The entire distribution model is different. Getting songs on the handful of radio markets in each town is no longer the trajectory to popularity.

I'd actually contend there are more band and artists with some kind of improvisation/jamming component than there were in the 60s. My music collection sure seems to reflect that anyway.

[Eric***]

Yup, I agree with Robert and R_of_G. I think improvisation has been going on for years. Guitar is just another handy medium for throwing out ideas and improvising, and perhaps the whole rock and roll culture embraces the idea of improvisation in certain contexts (big concerts, etc.).

[rcwilk]

Some very good thoughts and points here. Let's focus in a bit. I want to tighten up my question to say something more like

How is guitar improv different from improv on other instruments? (and more technically) are there some forms of guitar music that lend themselves to improvisation more than others?

RC

[Eric***]

Some very good thoughts and points here. Let's focus in a bit. I want to tighten up my question to say something more like

How is guitar improv different from improv on other instruments? (and more technically) are there some forms of guitar music that lend themselves to improvisation more than others?

Ah, well that's less focusing and more of a different question. I think the intervals and layout of an instrument just kind of lead to natural things you do in improvisation like double-stops, bends, etc. Pitch bending is probably one of the biggest things that guitars excel at, and that tends to be a good way to emote on an instrument.

As far as forms of music, I'd say the simpler music like blues are easier to improvise over, but I don't know that simplicity necessarily defines a style as more improvisation-friendly.

[rcwilk]

... I think the intervals and layout of an instrument just kind of lead to natural things you do in improvisation like double-stops, bends, etc. Pitch bending is probably one of the biggest things that guitars excel at, and that tends to be a good way to emote on an instrument.

Someone on Guitar Forums mentioned something similar, the direct contact the guitar playing has with the stings. Good points.

[R_of_G]

How is guitar improv different from improv on other instruments?

I'd suggest the differences are some mixture of the sonic differences of the instrument itself and the creative and technical prowess of the individual musician.

Several guitarists I enjoy cite saxophonists above/alongside other guitarists as their primary influences, and between developing certain techniques and mastering effects technology or the use of feedback, they've managed to successfully create some rather horn-like sounds.

Of course it goes both ways. Miles Davis made much use of the auto-wah with his 70s bands which opened up a sonic palette not available to him playing solely acoustic trumpet.

(and more technically) are there some forms of guitar music that lend themselves to improvisation more than others?

Given a musician open to improvisation, I'd say any music that isn't entirely through-composed can lend itself to improvisation. Simpler styles like blues and drone rock are great places for the novice improviser to start, but I agree with Eric, simplicity in and of itself doesn't make a style more improv-friendly.

For example, blues lends itself to improv for beginners not only for the simplicity, but because whether or not one actively listens to the blues, it's structure is so ingrained in American popular music that we're all pretty familiar with much of the common sonic language before we ever even learn how to do it on a guitar.

[rcwilk]

How do you think modeling guitars (like the variax from line6) that can imitate other instruments impact guitar players? Will guitar players that sound like sax start emerging as stars, or will the guitar sound be subsumed under keyboards or ?

[piebaldpython***]

Improv can be simple-based (Blues) or complex-based (Jazz)......and it started well before the git was thought of as a solo instrument. Just look at the fundamental design of string, brass and woodwinds.....if they can't play chords, then you can only play single-string (haha) runs.

Git players can be influenced by other instruments, Duane and SRV for example, listened to the blues harp masters......or they can influence other instruments.

Lastly, improv probably came about because someone was jamming while plastered and couldn't remember the next part of a tune and had to make-it-up on the spot. Tongue firmly in cheek here.

The Variac gits essentially turn the guitar into a keyboard with strings. That's not a knock, just what it is. What I like is when an instrument plays "runs" or "phrasing" more commonly associated with other instruments (see paragraph above).

[rcwilk]

I know in the Big Band era, it was the song and the instrumental that was for-fronted, and the voice only came in occasionally. But I don't really know if they were improvising. Out of that era, some singers emerged (Sinatra) that could stand alone without the band - but did they improvise much, or was that all just pop?

[Zip]

Where does guitar improvisation come from?

From the same place as any other instrument (or vocal) improv comes from - the desire to try out new ideas, often inspired by the other musicians you're playing with, whether studio or stage. Oftentimes sheer playfulness (Joe Walsh, with a gleam in his eye: "Oh, yeah? Well listen to this!"). My experience, it's almost always for the benefit of the players rather than the listeners.

As to Variac players emerging as stars, years ago (lots of them) I got to see Les McCann and Eddie Harris at a club in Michigan. The guitar player was Matt "Guitar" Murphy. He was playing a Vox Guitorgan. Some crazy sounds, for sure. During 'Compared To What?' he did a solo that was some of the best keyboard playing I ever heard. Without a keyboard. All these years later, I bet you don't know a single person who owns a Guitorgan, or has ever seen one in person. Just sayin'.

[rcwilk]

Ok, I seemed to have expressed the question too generally. What interests me is not so much where improvisation itself comes from (well, that does interest me, but later on that), but how improvisation emerged within the guitar culture. Maybe Charlie Patton wanted to stretch out his songs so people could dance in the juke joints. Muddy Waters got some mojo going on his guitar in Chicago that was different from Hooker in Detroit boogie blues. While curious about the individual styles, I'm here more interested in how you (all) guitar players see how your instruments lend themselves to improvisation (or not).

I've noticed, for example, that on Gibson 335's the fret board is very narrow at the bottom, but there seems to be plenty of room around the 8-10th fret and higher between the strings, which leads to bending without getting tangled and hence to shifting the improv (with bends) to higher frets. Some say that Strats are better for improv because they have wider fretboards, traditionally.

RC

[piebaldpython***]

Hey "rcwilk".....just curiosity on my part....but...uh.....I'm getting the "feeling" that we're part of a scholastic project here.......not that I mind.......but is that where this is ultimately going? Do you even play guitar?

As to fretboards, etc.......the width of the frets is a direct relation to the scale of the guitar. It's a mathematical equation and conceivably one could have ANY scale length they wanted if they knew how to divide the frets.

Fenders typically have a scale length of 25.5"; Gibson LPs come in at 24.75".

When you get to lap steel guitars, their regular scale lengths can go from 22.5" up to 26".

I have no idea why fretboards widths vary like they do except to say it must be for economy of playing. DUNNO. Classical are the widest, acoustics are next and electrics are the narrowest. Hmmmmmmm....maybe it has to do with the distance between the strings for easy of picking??

[rcwilk]

Hey "rcwilk".....just curiosity on my part....but...uh.....I'm getting the "feeling" that we're part of a scholastic project here.......not that I mind.......but is that where this is ultimately going? Do you even play guitar?

ha ha - guitar hobbyist, I would classify myself. I did just sign up for the class from coursera.org on the history of rock and roll, and it did made me consider doing a project, though I usually just 'audit' those classes. But now your question has opened up the "RC" way of doing things, ha ha. Several threads have led to this question about improvisation, some of which I expressed abstractly, but here more personally : I am learning the studio version of Red House/Hendrix, and (gack) at the same time learning Clapton's lead on Crossroad. My general trend these last few years (as a hobbyist) has been learning about the blues, historically and on guitar and I do love the way the blues lends itself to guitar improvisation and leads. Recently I picked up the Clapton autobiography while waiting for the dentist and then had to finish it, scouring it for how he sees his own improvisation and which guitars he does want on. I've been reading the hendrix/clapton comparisons online, and there is some info of importance (for me) there, but I thought some discussion groups with guitar folk would have much more to say, and you sure have!

Ultimately going. Hey I thought we were improvising! ha ha. Well, I do want to broaden my view on guitar improv, and eventually break away from just learning other people's leads. But every time I just space out and go into guitar heaven, though lots of fun, I don't really come out with much on the other end except maybe being a looser player and counting it as a good time. I'm ok with that, but I just don't seem to have my short term memory connected during improvisation, and I think for me it is a fundamental key to being in that mode. Maybe not for others - some here seem to do improv just the opposite - in a realm of clear structure and knowing. Learning other people's styles seems to really feed my having fun when just jamin' , so I guess I do get "better." though when I record and listen back, I don't think so.

On another level, I think improvisation has kind of been a life-long value that best expresses one of the characters in the circus of play and joy, grace and transcendence. I best not go on and on about that here, but if interested, I think the French post-structuralists have the most to say about escaping from territorializing regimes and entering into the creative improverse, and have written more here http://dreamgate.com/pomo

As to fretboards, etc.......the width of the frets is a direct relation to the scale of the guitar. It's a mathematical equation and conceivably one could have ANY scale length they wanted if they knew how to divide the frets.

Fenders typically have a scale length of 25.5"; Gibson LPs come in at 24.75".

When you get to lap steel guitars, their regular scale lengths can go from 22.5" up to 26".

I have no idea why fretboards widths vary like they do except to say it must be for economy of playing. DUNNO. Classical are the widest, acoustics are next and electrics are the narrowest. Hmmmmmmm....maybe it has to do with the distance between the strings for easy of picking??

I have one guitar friend who won't play on my acoustic D35Martin, but keeps begging to get my dy61Alvarez. I think it is partially because he is used to playing electric and likes the narrower width of the Alvarez. It took me sometime to adjust, but now I think the Martin is easier to pick and play leads as my fingers don't get as pinched in the smaller Alvarez strings.

Electric wise, I don't have a strat or tele, but he keeps recommending them, saying as you have said, they have a wider fretboard. And again, I've noticed people with narrow ES 335 Gibson's migrating to solid bodies if they do a lot of lead work.

RC

[Robert****]

To become a better improviser, here is my recipe. These are not in order - practice all of them continually.

1) Learn the instrument - learn where the notes are on the fretboard.

2) Learn which scales and "tools" you can use over different types chords.

3) Listen and listen and listen to good players. Listen actively, and try and sing along/hum along to melodies and solos.

4) Tap your foot, and learn how to use a metronome/drum machine when practicing.

5) Transcribe. Copy and steal little things here and there, and make them part of your own playing. Connect this to 1) and 2).

6) Take lessons from a GOOD teacher, once in a while. Weekly lessons are not needed if you are a driven person. Once every month or every two months is enough.

See also http://www.dolphinstreet.com/become_...guitar_player/

[rcwilk]

To become a better improviser, here is my recipe. These are not in order - practice all of them continually.
1) Learn the instrument - learn where the notes are on the fretboard.

So how deeply do you suggest one learns the notes? I mean it is one thing to stop and say, hmm, that is a F# in this key. It's quite another to play the note as you are reading it off a piece of sheet music.

RC

[R_of_G]

5) Transcribe. Copy and steal little things here and there, and make them part of your own playing. Connect this to 1) and 2).

This is a tremendously valuable skill to develop.

Aside from the obvious benefit of being able to replicate what you hear, perhaps my favorite by-product of my attempts at transcription is that it's often a trial-and-error endeavor and many times those "errors" have led me to little riffs or licks of my own.

Ok, s maybe I didn't figure out that one chromatic run in the 22nd chorus of a Coltrane solo, but I found a neat little lick to use. Know what I mean?