Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2968
Fender Am. Std Strat & Raw Vintage
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Fender Am. Std Strat & Raw Vintage

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Fender Am. Std Strat & Raw Vintage

    Here are 2 demos of the Standard American Strat, now with Raw Vintage saddles & tremolo springs added.


    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Plymouth, MA USA
    Posts
    2,077
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Well, what do you say, Robert - do you think that they made an appreciable difference? I thought you were going to swap out the pups, too...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Yes, I think it was worth the change - the tone is richer, fuller, in my opinion.

    The pups have been changed... these were the last demos with this guitar with the stock pickups (which are great by the way).
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Uppah Noo Yawk
    Posts
    7,407
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I'd want to hear the difference "A/B'd" to be convinced that this change makes any appreciable tonal difference. Not saying it isn't possible, but I have to admit to being a bit skeptical. I think it's just human nature that our ears tend to hear what we want them to hear. I know I've been guilty of this on several occasions. I make a change, convince myself that it sounds better, and within a month or two, come to the conclusion that nothing really changed. Or maybe that's just me....

    That said, your tone & playing sound GREAT, as usual! But I tend to think it's 90% in your fingers....
    DVM's Ever-Expanding Gear List:

    Guitars - W-A-A-A-Y-Y too many to list. Check 'em all out HERE

    Amps & Cabs - "Kap'n Kerrang-aroo" BYOC 18W TMB kit amp head; Mojave Coyote head; Fender Hot Rod Deluxe Lacquered Tweed Ltd. Ed.; Allen Sweet Spot kit amp; BYOC Tweed Royal kit amp; Epiphone Valve Jr. combo + mods; Drive 2x12 cab / Celestion G12M Greenback + G12H30; AB Custom Audio 1x12 cab / Celestion Alnico Blue

    Pedals/Effects - ZILLIONS, including DVM's Home-built Pedals - See some HERE and HERE, TOO!

    DVM's Gear Photos
    Visit MY WEBSITE!



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Thanks Vood, that's why I made 2 videos (with JVM and Samamp) before I changed to the Raw Vintage gear. You can A/B yourself by switching between those videos! There are 2 before and 2 after...

    The recording gear and process was identical on all 4 videos.

    In my opinion, the guitar sounds fuller and less "rattly", less brittle sounding. I know it's probably hard to tell the audible effect from a video. Another thing - it feels better to play the guitar now than before.

    I suspect the saddles are the main source for the improvement in tonal quality, but I got the springs any way while I was at it. They are a bit stronger than my stock springs, so perhaps that is a good thing too. I wasn't nerdy enough to record with only the saddles changed, and then with only the springs changed. I don't have that much time on my hands!
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think they are beautifully made and sound great but there is an issue on my EJ strat.
    The high E is kicked offline. Maybe they are slightly wider...not sure but I may put the stock saddles back on.
    I do like the feel of the springs for sure.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    They have 2 different versions. Make sure you get the saddles with the correct spacing...
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    17
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I definitely have the right ones (RVS-112)
    I just put a micrometer on them. The stock EJ saddles mic at .43 wide and the RW saddles as noted in their documentation mic at .441. Cumulatively over six saddles it's enough
    to make the E to E spread wider than stock.
    I have a Callaham block coming. When I install that I will put the stock saddle back on.

    Fine product for sure but on this particular guitar, where the strings are already too close the edge of the neck they are not working.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Ok, they fit perfectly on an Am. Std. Strat - perhaps it has wider spacing compared to yours, I don't know.
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •