2nd Fret Capo

[Skip77]

I understand that performers place capo to change guitar pitch so that it harmonizes more naturally with their voices, or vice versa. I have never used a capo but wonder if someone can explain all the benefits and uses?

Also, I have noticed many guitarists that do not sing, playing purely solo, with capo placed at 2nd fret. Why do they do this?

[Spudman***]

Some acoustic guitars are easier to play and fit the singer's voice when they are tuned down a step or so. In order to play in another key they need a capo placed somewhere on the neck. Also, when using a capo it allows you to play with open chords in other keys and that gives a song a whole different flavor. You can also change tunings just by using the capo on 2 or 3 strings depending on how the guitar is tuned.

[Skip77]

Thanks Spudman. So does that mean depending on a particular song, placing capo might make the song easier to play, such as changing fingering patterns to more open strings? If that is the case it might explain why I see so many guitarists using capo at 2nd/3rd frets, as you suggested.

[strumsalot]

So does that mean depending on a particular song, placing capo might make the song easier to play?

Yep. My wife loves to sing in the Key of Eb. So that's capo on the first fret and playing in the much easier Key of D.

[marnold***]

I was looking at a particular song and couldn't understand why they would use a capo. Then I realized that by putting a capo on the third fret, you could use chords that were much easier to play.

In this case (the song was "Away in a Manger" FWIW) if you didn't use a capo, the chords would be D, F#m, B, Em, A, and A7. Not impossible, but the F#m and B add an extra degree of difficulty. With a capo on the third fret, you could play F, Am, D, Gm, C, C7. The only "tricky" one there is the C7, which you only play once so it's not a big deal.

[Skip77]

thanks marnold - that helps clarify my understanding. I get it. Obviously, some chord changes are more difficult than others and I see now that the capo can change that for the better in certain cases.

Does anyone know if there is a webpage that contains some kind of chart that suggests when to use the capo, where to place it and resulting chord changes?

[marnold***]

I accidentally deleted my message. Grrr.

The chords with a capo would be F, Am, D, Gm, C, C7. Without a capo would be D, F#m, B, Em, A, A7. The more I look at this though, I think I might have the chords reversed. I've just confused myself. If I had a capo I'd check it out. My point stands, though. Sometimes I capo makes the chord fingerings easier.

I need more coffee.

[t_ross33]

I used to use a capo extensively cuz I was too dumb or too lazy to learn how to properly barre chords - and needed to get into a key that I knew the chords for and would also match my meager vocal range/ability.

All kidding aside, I think open strings and chords ring out better on an acoustic than barred fingerings, so a capo comes in handy. It also changes the timbre when you play, say, an open G chord with a capo on the 5th fret (I think it would be a C then??).

Play around with it and see what you can come up with.

Trev

[wingsdad]

It's all about the chord 'voicing'; Play an open E chord, no capo. Then capo at II and play a D chord or capo at VII and play an A (as you would in Open position). Compare the sound of the chord.

Kyser Capos come in a variety of types, even a 'Drop-D' and a 3-String 'Short Cut':
Kyser Quick Change Capos

[Skip77]

WD - thanks. I saved the Kyser site to my git folder. I have never used a capo but have one that came with a git I got at a yard sale. I always liked the spring clamp type made by Kyser. Found the page hard to get pricing for items. Is there a trick to that? I'm sure business is lost because pricing and ordering is not simple the way their page is setup.

[tjcurtin1]

There are a number of good indications of use of capo in Harvey Reid and Joyce Andersen's 'Song Train' book (a great collection of 2-chord songs performed on accompaniying cd's, mentioned here in another thread). Harvery Reid is apparently the/a big developer/promoter of the use of partial capo's (also discussed in the book).

[Skip77]

Thanks TJ - interesting. Will check it out.

[wingsdad]

...I always liked the spring clamp type made by Kyser. Found the page hard to get pricing for items. Is there a trick to that? I'm sure business is lost because pricing and ordering is not simple the way their page is setup.

There's no pricing because they don't sell direct. You can find Kyser's capos LifeGuard acoustic guitar humidifiers and Dr. Stringfellow care stuff at online retailers like Musician's "Friend" or your nearest equally 'friendly' Guitar Center:
Kyser Products at MF

[merlin]

OK, here is a capo question that has been bothering me lately. I do not have a music theory background and I think this would fall in that category.

When you use a capo why do we still call the chords by the same name as we would without a capo? Since there is a capo on wouldn't that change a chord?

example: with the capo on the second fret playing a A chord is the same as a B chord with no capo on. So why don't we call it a B chord?

Is this just to make it simple? I would think this would make a difference if you are trying to play with a group in a certain key.

I hope I have explained my question correctly.

[Rocket]

K-I-S-S methodology!
I call it what it is... a chord is the sound of the chord, not the visual of finger position. Bmaj is a Bmaj is a Bmaj.

[Dreadman]

A couple more uses of a capo - I keep a lot of guitars tuned down a half step. If I'm playing with someone who's guitar is tuned to concert pitch I just put the capo on the first fret and we're tuned alike.

Also very handy for working on guitars. One example would be if you're working on an acoustic saddle you can put velcro across the strings near the bridge and a capo at the first fret to keep the strings neat for quick saddle removal and re-installation.

[Dreadman]

K-I-S-S methodology!
I call it what it is... a chord is the sound of the chord, not the visual of finger position. Bmaj is a Bmaj is a Bmaj.

Clearly the best way - but you've got to actually understand some music theory to get the names right.

[merlin]

K-I-S-S methodology!
I call it what it is... a chord is the sound of the chord, not the visual of finger position. Bmaj is a Bmaj is a Bmaj.

Rocket, I am having trouble following you.
So, do we call these chords the same just to keep it simple or should we call the chords by how they sound?
If you are playing with a band wouldn't you need to know the chord by sound and not finger formation?

[Rocket]

Close your eyes.
The chord is the sound of the chord... if it sounds like a Bmaj, it's a Bmaj.