Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Question about "solid" bodies.
Results 1 to 19 of 23

Thread: Question about "solid" bodies.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Westminster, Colorado
    Posts
    2,203
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marnold
    Only really expensive guitars will be one-piece. Even then, you might have a flame-maple top or something similar that will add at least one if not two extra pieces of wood. If you look at the back of the guitar at an angle in the light, you can sometimes tell where the seams are--at least if the guitar has a glossy finish.

    And, as Tung said, it is solid as opposed to being a hollow body or made of plywood.
    Remember those photoflame guitars that Fender made a few years ago? They laminated a "picture" of a solid piece of wood on top of a body made of several laminated pieces. They looked cool, but got discontinued after guitar players figured it out.

    tung

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Jensen Beach, Florida
    Posts
    2,145
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I've actually heard people argue that a one piece body is not as strong and as a two (or more) piece body. The claim is, a one piece body would be more prone to warping than a two (or more) piece body would. I don't know that I buy into that theory. I've never heard of a properly dried and finished one piece body warping...

    Getting a one piece body can dependent upon the type of wood used to an extent. Bodies made of wood like alder are usually two or more pieces because it's not common to find alder trees that are of large enough diameter to produce many one piece blanks. Not impossible, but not very common either.

    Multi piece bodies are for economy, pure and simple. But, a two piece body can be selected purposely in order to match grain patterns. This is common on laminated tops where you'll see the term "book matched" in describing the top. In this process a blank of the desired thickness is split in half length-wise, and then opened up so that they grain matches in a mirror image pattern. It's really noticable with a wood like a flamed maple, but it can be very attractive with a thicker body blank in a straighter grained wood as well.

    As to the tone, I've played multi-piece bodies that resonated beautifully, and I've played one and two piece bodies that were bricks. It's just the nature of wood, and the number of pieces isn't always the determining factor in tone.

    Edit to add: A solid body guitar just means that it's solid throughout the thickness of the body, excepting such things as pickup and control cavities. Non solid bodies would be like the hollow jazz boxes, semi-hollow, or chambered bodies that have thin but solid tops, sides, and backs, but are hollow or semi-hollow inside. A solid alder body, would mean that the body is solid and the wood used is all alder, regardless of the number of pieces. This is why you have to be careful when you hear terms like, "solid body, solid wood construction". That could mean any kind of wood even plywood at a stretch because it's made of "solid wood" (although IMO, all that glue that holds plywood together is hardly wood).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Mountains of Kentucky
    Posts
    1,382
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I remember from days in wood shop class , glueing large pieces of walnut , pine, or maple to make a large solid piece that was just amazing at how strong this bonded wood could become and how you could really feel the vibrations across it if you drilled or hammered on it, the transfer was as if it was one piece.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bloozcat
    I've actually heard people argue that a one piece body is not as strong and as a two (or more) piece body. The claim is, a one piece body would be more prone to warping than a two (or more) piece body would. I don't know that I buy into that theory. I've never heard of a properly dried and finished one piece body warping...
    Viewing it strictly from a woodworking standpoint, that statement is true. A two or three piece body, glued properly, with or without biscuits will be stronger than a one piece body. If the guitar was hit or had pressure applied from either the front or back until breakage, it would not break along the glue lines where it was jointed.

    The same holds true for warping. Multi-piece is less apt to warp.

    The breaking I base on taking wood working for a few years and actually experimenting to prove it wrong and could not. The warping I state based on a number of much better woodworkers than me.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NW Missouri,
    Posts
    4,097
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That's why cutting blocks are made from many pieces of wood glued together.
    When butchers are hammering them with meat cleavers and washing them with disinfectant they won't warp or crack.
    Guitars
    Wilburn Versatare, '52 FrankenTele(Fender licensed parts), Fender USA Roadhouse Strat, Fender USA Standard B-bender Telecaster, Agile AL 3000 w/ WCR pickups, Ibanez MIJ V300 Acoustic, Squier Precision Bass,
    Amps
    Ceriatone Overtone Special, Musicman 212 Sixty-Five, Fender Blues Jr., Peavey Classic 30, Fender Super Reverb, Traynor YCV-40 WR Anniversary w/ matching 1x12 ext. cab, Epiphone SoCal 50w head w/ matching 4x12 cab (Lady Luck speakers), Avatar 2x12 semi-open back cab w/ Celestion speakers
    Pedals
    Digitech Bad Monkey, Digitech Jamman, DVM's ZYS, Goodrich volume pedal

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldguy
    That's why cutting blocks are made from many pieces of wood glued together.
    When butchers are hammering them with meat cleavers and washing them with disinfectant they won't warp or crack.
    That's a great example.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    287
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bloozcat
    Getting a one piece body can dependent upon the type of wood used to an extent. Bodies made of wood like alder are usually two or more pieces because it's not common to find alder trees that are of large enough diameter to produce many one piece blanks. Not impossible, but not very common either.
    Precisely! :

    Most American Fenders are 2-4 pieces of wood and MIM (depending on construction period) may by up to 7!

    I also heard (from a very reliable source) about a certain American Fender Richie Sambora signature, made of no less than 11 different pieces of wood!!!

    As to the tone, I've played multi-piece bodies that resonated beautifully, and I've played one and two piece bodies that were bricks. It's just the nature of wood, and the number of pieces isn't always the determining factor in tone.

    Edit to add: A solid body guitar just means that it's solid throughout the thickness of the body, excepting such things as pickup and control cavities. Non solid bodies would be like the hollow jazz boxes, semi-hollow, or chambered bodies that have thin but solid tops, sides, and backs, but are hollow or semi-hollow inside. A solid alder body, would mean that the body is solid and the wood used is all alder, regardless of the number of pieces. This is why you have to be careful when you hear terms like, "solid body, solid wood construction". That could mean any kind of wood even plywood at a stretch because it's made of "solid wood" (although IMO, all that glue that holds plywood together is hardly wood).
    Very nicely said!

    I should add that, in my perspective, "solid" means "not made of particle board". This may seem astonishing to some of the youngsters in here but most of us old geeks (going into our forties at least), used to have a cheap, Asian made particle board guitar as our first electric. Mine was a Hondo, still have it in fact!

    At some point then, it used to mean "made of quality wood", if that is something more than marketing mojo is something I don't really wish to elaborate.

    Note: A guitar made of plywood or similar, is usually heavier than a solid wood guitar, due to all that glue inside!
    Gearlist:
    Guitars
    - Kramer Pacer Deluxe (’87) with SD pickups
    - EBMM 25th Anniversary hardtail
    - EBMM Axis Super Sport hardtail
    - Squier CV Tele (Reliced!)
    - "Relic Wallpaper Squier ’51 (heavily modded)
    - Custom made Precision type bass with EMG pickup and custom paintjob

    Amps
    - THD Univalve
    - Tech21 Trademark 10
    - 2x12” Tube Town "flexi-back" cabinet, with Celestion Speakers

    Effects, etc
    Peterson Strobostomp, Budda Bud-wah, BYOC Script Phaser, Proco RAT (original), Boss HM-2 (modded), EHX Deluxe Memory Man, Line6 M13 Stompbox Modeller, Axon AX-100 MkII, Digitech GSP1101/Control2



    Visit my page on myspace:
    http://www.myspace.com/thegenusloci

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by abraxas
    I should add that, in my perspective, "solid" means "not made of particle board". This may seem astonishing to some of the youngsters in here but most of us old geeks (going into our forties at least), used to have a cheap, Asian made particle board guitar as our first electric. Mine was a Hondo, still have it in fact!

    At some point then, it used to mean "made of quality wood", if that is something more than marketing mojo is something I don't really wish to elaborate.

    Note: A guitar made of plywood or similar, is usually heavier than a solid wood guitar, due to all that glue inside!
    And that just about nails it. Manufacturers have used lots of "tricks" to make up for non availability of large enough pieces of wood. Epiphone Les Pauls are (or have been) many blocks of alder veneered with mahogany, I also suspect they used the "photoflame" technique at some point. The top on my Epi LP appeared to have no depth whatsoever. Older Japanese Les Paul copies will often have a space between the body and the top. Fender used poplar bodies veneered with ash on their "plus" range in the 90s. My strat is built this way. Even 1970s Les Pauls were of a pancake construction, i.e. two thinner slabs of mahogany one on top of the other. The rosewood telecaster has the same construction but hollowed out a bit to avoid winding up with an 11+ pound tele.

    Guitar manufacturers appear to follow the semantic rules laid down by Humpty Dumpty in Alice.... "Why, it means whatever I want it to mean".
    Electric: Fat strat > Korg PB > TS7 > DS1 > DD-20 > Cube 60 (Fender model)

    Acoustic: Guitar > microphone > audience

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    OK, so maybe this isn't off-topic, after all.

    I believe G&L means it when they call a solid body a solid body.

    Solid Swamp Ash body blanks stored in the G&L Factory:



    One of those blanks getting marked with a template to cut an ASAT body:



    An ASAT body getting routed:
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •