Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 19 of 23

Thread: Question about "solid" bodies.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    323
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Question about "solid" bodies.

    Newbie-ish question:

    OK, say you have a Squier, an SX, a Fender MIM, and an American Fender strat and each is advertised as having a "solid alder body."

    However, the definition of "solid" can certainly mean different things. As far as I know, most (if not all) Squiers are made of different pieces of wood glued together and shaped into a strat body. The American strat (and I presume the MIM) are made of a single piece of wood. I'm not sure about the SX, but I presume it's similar to the Squier. (If I'm wrong about any of these, please correct me.)

    How can you tell which guitars are built from a single piece versus several pieces? Also, is it really fair advertising to call a multi-piece body a "solid" body?
    -Kodiak
    Guitars:
    Washburn Idol 64 DL w/GFS Dream 180 pups
    Washburn X-33 w/GFS 60's-70's Grey Bottom Non Stagger Overwound
    Stagg G300 SG w/GFS Power Rails
    Art & Lutherie Acoustic

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    451
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I don't know how SX guitars are made, but I think is fair to call a multi-piece body a "solid body", meaning not chambered, semi-hollow, or completely hollow as in acoustic or jazz boxes.
    Guitars: '05 MIA Fender Strat HSS, '04 MIA Fender Strat SSS, '03 Burns Steer, '83 Hondo LP copy (project)

    Amps: Fender Blues Jr., Line 6 Spider II 112

    Pedals: Boss BD-2, Boss CS-3, Boss DS-1, Ibanez TS9DX, Ibanez AW7, Ibanez FZ7, DigiTech Bad Monkey, BYOC Lazy Sprocket (in progress - almost there), Danelectro Cool Cat Chorus.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,347
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kodiak3D
    How can you tell which guitars are built from a single piece versus several pieces?
    check the price tag? :
    I can't say that I've given up on a flanger cause I've never liked the effect either. I also can't say the same about Tremolo. I hate them both equally. - Tone2TheBone 2009

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Westminster, Colorado
    Posts
    2,203
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My understanding is that solid bodies are just that: made of solid wood, i.e., not plywood.

    A solid body can be and usually is made of more than one piece of wood unless it is advertised as being a "one-piece" body. Even the higher end Amercan standard strats have at least two-piece bodies unless it is specifically stated that they have one-piece bodies.

    The less expensive guitars tend to have three or more pieces to the body, it just makes economic sense as it is getting harder and harder to find full-width solid planks for one-piece bodies.

    With clear or sunburst finishes, it is easy to tell if the body is made of two or more pieces. Obviously, with solid/opaque finishes it is harder to tell.

    As long as the body is made of pieces of solid wood, it isn't really plywood, so I don't have a problem calling it a solid body.

    HTH,

    tung

    Quote Originally Posted by Kodiak3D
    Newbie-ish question:

    OK, say you have a Squier, an SX, a Fender MIM, and an American Fender strat and each is advertised as having a "solid alder body."

    However, the definition of "solid" can certainly mean different things. As far as I know, most (if not all) Squiers are made of different pieces of wood glued together and shaped into a strat body. The American strat (and I presume the MIM) are made of a single piece of wood. I'm not sure about the SX, but I presume it's similar to the Squier. (If I'm wrong about any of these, please correct me.)

    How can you tell which guitars are built from a single piece versus several pieces? Also, is it really fair advertising to call a multi-piece body a "solid" body?
    Last edited by tunghaichuan; March 12th, 2008 at 11:05 AM. Reason: can't spell worth a crap

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    7,254
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Only really expensive guitars will be one-piece. Even then, you might have a flame-maple top or something similar that will add at least one if not two extra pieces of wood. If you look at the back of the guitar at an angle in the light, you can sometimes tell where the seams are--at least if the guitar has a glossy finish.

    And, as Tung said, it is solid as opposed to being a hollow body or made of plywood.
    Axen: Jackson DK2M, Fender Deluxe Nashville Telecaster, Reverend Warhawk 390, Taylor 914ce, ESP LTD Surveyor-414
    Amphen: Jet City JCA22H and JCA12S cab, Carvin X-60 combo, Acoustic B20
    Effecten: "Thesis 96" Overdrive/Boost (aka DVM OD2), Hardwire DL-8 Digital Delay/Looper, DigiTech Polara Reverb, DigiTech EX-7 Expression Factory and CF-7 Chorus Factory, Danelectro CF-1 Cool Cat Fuzz
    "I wish Imagine Dragons would be stuck in an Arcade Fire for an entire Vampire Weekend."--Brian Posehn

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Westminster, Colorado
    Posts
    2,203
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marnold
    Only really expensive guitars will be one-piece. Even then, you might have a flame-maple top or something similar that will add at least one if not two extra pieces of wood. If you look at the back of the guitar at an angle in the light, you can sometimes tell where the seams are--at least if the guitar has a glossy finish.

    And, as Tung said, it is solid as opposed to being a hollow body or made of plywood.
    Remember those photoflame guitars that Fender made a few years ago? They laminated a "picture" of a solid piece of wood on top of a body made of several laminated pieces. They looked cool, but got discontinued after guitar players figured it out.

    tung

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Jensen Beach, Florida
    Posts
    2,145
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I've actually heard people argue that a one piece body is not as strong and as a two (or more) piece body. The claim is, a one piece body would be more prone to warping than a two (or more) piece body would. I don't know that I buy into that theory. I've never heard of a properly dried and finished one piece body warping...

    Getting a one piece body can dependent upon the type of wood used to an extent. Bodies made of wood like alder are usually two or more pieces because it's not common to find alder trees that are of large enough diameter to produce many one piece blanks. Not impossible, but not very common either.

    Multi piece bodies are for economy, pure and simple. But, a two piece body can be selected purposely in order to match grain patterns. This is common on laminated tops where you'll see the term "book matched" in describing the top. In this process a blank of the desired thickness is split in half length-wise, and then opened up so that they grain matches in a mirror image pattern. It's really noticable with a wood like a flamed maple, but it can be very attractive with a thicker body blank in a straighter grained wood as well.

    As to the tone, I've played multi-piece bodies that resonated beautifully, and I've played one and two piece bodies that were bricks. It's just the nature of wood, and the number of pieces isn't always the determining factor in tone.

    Edit to add: A solid body guitar just means that it's solid throughout the thickness of the body, excepting such things as pickup and control cavities. Non solid bodies would be like the hollow jazz boxes, semi-hollow, or chambered bodies that have thin but solid tops, sides, and backs, but are hollow or semi-hollow inside. A solid alder body, would mean that the body is solid and the wood used is all alder, regardless of the number of pieces. This is why you have to be careful when you hear terms like, "solid body, solid wood construction". That could mean any kind of wood even plywood at a stretch because it's made of "solid wood" (although IMO, all that glue that holds plywood together is hardly wood).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Mountains of Kentucky
    Posts
    1,382
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I remember from days in wood shop class , glueing large pieces of walnut , pine, or maple to make a large solid piece that was just amazing at how strong this bonded wood could become and how you could really feel the vibrations across it if you drilled or hammered on it, the transfer was as if it was one piece.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bloozcat
    I've actually heard people argue that a one piece body is not as strong and as a two (or more) piece body. The claim is, a one piece body would be more prone to warping than a two (or more) piece body would. I don't know that I buy into that theory. I've never heard of a properly dried and finished one piece body warping...
    Viewing it strictly from a woodworking standpoint, that statement is true. A two or three piece body, glued properly, with or without biscuits will be stronger than a one piece body. If the guitar was hit or had pressure applied from either the front or back until breakage, it would not break along the glue lines where it was jointed.

    The same holds true for warping. Multi-piece is less apt to warp.

    The breaking I base on taking wood working for a few years and actually experimenting to prove it wrong and could not. The warping I state based on a number of much better woodworkers than me.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NW Missouri,
    Posts
    4,097
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    That's why cutting blocks are made from many pieces of wood glued together.
    When butchers are hammering them with meat cleavers and washing them with disinfectant they won't warp or crack.
    Guitars
    Wilburn Versatare, '52 FrankenTele(Fender licensed parts), Fender USA Roadhouse Strat, Fender USA Standard B-bender Telecaster, Agile AL 3000 w/ WCR pickups, Ibanez MIJ V300 Acoustic, Squier Precision Bass,
    Amps
    Ceriatone Overtone Special, Musicman 212 Sixty-Five, Fender Blues Jr., Peavey Classic 30, Fender Super Reverb, Traynor YCV-40 WR Anniversary w/ matching 1x12 ext. cab, Epiphone SoCal 50w head w/ matching 4x12 cab (Lady Luck speakers), Avatar 2x12 semi-open back cab w/ Celestion speakers
    Pedals
    Digitech Bad Monkey, Digitech Jamman, DVM's ZYS, Goodrich volume pedal

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldguy
    That's why cutting blocks are made from many pieces of wood glued together.
    When butchers are hammering them with meat cleavers and washing them with disinfectant they won't warp or crack.
    That's a great example.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    GVL FLA USA
    Posts
    4,323
    Post Thanks / Like

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by tunghaichuan
    My understanding is that solid bodies are just that: made of solid wood, i.e., not plywood.

    A solid body can be and usually is made of more than one piece of wood unless it is advertised as being a "one-piece" body. Even the higher end Amercan standard strats have at least two-piece bodies unless it is specifically stated that they have one-piece bodies.
    This is correct.

    I have a Les Paul Classic with a 2-piece back and 2-piece top. And a 1960 Duo-Sonic with a 3-piece body. My Hamer Special and '52 Tele RI might be one-piece, but I'd doubt it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    central florida
    Posts
    4,577
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    the only guitar i know is one piece is my les paul special....

    ww
    Quote Originally Posted by just strum
    For the record, my annoyance with Warren has a lot to do with the hissing noises he makes.
    Guitars: Gibson 1998 Les Paul Special : Peavey Predator (Early 90's Fat Strat Copy) : Ibanez GAX30TR
    Brownsville Reso - 101 Electric Reso : Fender GDO-300 Maple Quilt Top Acoustic

    Amps: Fender Super Champ XD

    Effects: Digitech RP250 Modeling Guitar Processor : DVM "Phased and Confused" Script Phaser Clone : Digitech Bad Monkey
    Danelectro Cool Cat Chorus : Behringer Distortion Modeler : Ernie Ball Volume Pedal : Dunlop Cry Baby Wah

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    North of the Equator: I am a Southerner, Southern Ontario!
    Posts
    2,041
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I always considered my Les Paul Studio to be a "Solid body electric", but now they have chambered bodies. I wonder what the future description for them would be? Maybe Solid top chambered body Electric guitar?
    The Blues is alright!

    Guitars: 1968 Gibson SG, 2005 Gibson SG Standard, 2006 Gibson LP Classic Gold top, 2004 Epiphone Elitist LP Custom, 1996 Gibson Les Paul Standard. 2001 Epiphone Sheraton II, 2007 Epiphone G400.
    Fender Strats: 1996 Fender 68 Reissue CIJ, 2008 Squier CV 50s, 2009 Squier CV 50s Tele Butterescotch Blonde

    Amps: Blues Junior Special edition Jensen in Brown Tolex with Wheat front, 65 Deluxe Reverb reissue,1970 Sonax reverb by Traynor, Avatar Custom 2/12 Cabinet with Eminence Legend V1216 speakers,
    2008 DSL100 Marshall Amp , Fender Super Champ XD,Fender Vibro Champ XD

    Effects and Pedals: Fulltone Fulldrive II, Fulltone OCD, Fulltone Mini Deja Vibe, Fulltone Fat Boost, Dunlop Crybaby Wah, Boss DS1, Boss DD20 Giga Delay, Boss TU2 tuner, Boss BD2, Ibanez TS9 Tube screamer, Zoom 505. Radial tonebone hot british.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Checked out my Strat and if you look from the front you would think it's one piece and even from the back it is difficult to tell. I then looked at butt end of the guitar and you can tell it's 3 pieces.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My best solid body is my G&L Comanche. I took a tip from Strum and looked up its butt end. It's 2 perfectly bookmatched pieces of Swamp Ash. Easy to tell because it's a transparent finish. My other solids are paint job finishes.

    Chambered bodies can be called either Semi-Hollow, if the chambers are large and run clear to the sides, like with a big honkin' sustain block in the center, or Semi-Solid (really...I had a Gibson BluesHawk that was called a Semi-Solid on its specs list), if the chambers don't run to the sides and are surrounded by some thick meat.
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    323
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wingsdad
    Chambered bodies can be called either Semi-Hollow, if the chambers are large and run clear to the sides, like with a big honkin' sustain block in the center, or Semi-Solid (really...I had a Gibson BluesHawk that was called a Semi-Solid on its specs list), if the chambers don't run to the sides and are surrounded by some thick meat.
    Semi-solid sounds so...squishy. :
    -Kodiak
    Guitars:
    Washburn Idol 64 DL w/GFS Dream 180 pups
    Washburn X-33 w/GFS 60's-70's Grey Bottom Non Stagger Overwound
    Stagg G300 SG w/GFS Power Rails
    Art & Lutherie Acoustic

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kodiak3D
    Semi-solid sounds so...squishy. :
    Yeah, doesn't it?

    Much sexier to call it an 'Ultra'. Like Gibson's Epiphone Les Paul Ultra and new Ultra II. But those are priced for 'working stiffs'.

    Now,Gibson being Gibson, you take a 'real' Les Paul, carve chambers into the notoriously spine-cracking hunk of mahogany, cap it with a AAAA flamed maple top, give it an MSRP over $5 Grand and call it a : Classic Supreme.



    I so love Gibson anymore...
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This 'assessment' I made haunted me within hours after I'd made it:
    Quote Originally Posted by wingsdad
    ....my G&L Comanche. I took a tip from Strum and looked up its butt end. It's 2 perfectly bookmatched pieces of Swamp Ash. Easy to tell because it's a transparent finish.
    So, I called G&L and asked. The guy was nice about it, but had to laugh. They cut all their guitars, solid or semi-hollow, from single-slab body blanks. For transparent finishes, they choose grain runs that will run 'to-center' more evenly than those for opaque finishes.

    I just didn't know what a perfect piece of ash : looks like.

    And as for 'semi-hollow' vs. 'semi-solid', he had an explanation for that, too, since I asked about my ASAT Semi-Hollow. The body is cut first as a solid body. Then they slice the top & bottom off, about 3/8" inch, more or less. They rout out the chambers & other cavities, then vacuum bond the top & bottom back to original positions. G&L calls this a Semi-Hollow simply "because the glass is half empty". Less than half, actually.

    Rather than wander off topic into a G&L thing here, I'll put the details in its own thread when I get a chance.
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •