Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Tele - Ugly or Beautiful?
Results 1 to 19 of 115

Thread: Tele - Ugly or Beautiful?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    central florida
    Posts
    4,577
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    i love my tele...i think it's been said a tele is the hardest guitar to play....not physically but it so raw that it exposes your every mistake (and i make a lot of them!)

    my tele gets equal playing time with my gibson lp special.

    here's mine....a mim 2005 agave blue standard (click for larger pics)

    ww

    Quote Originally Posted by just strum
    For the record, my annoyance with Warren has a lot to do with the hissing noises he makes.
    Guitars: Gibson 1998 Les Paul Special : Peavey Predator (Early 90's Fat Strat Copy) : Ibanez GAX30TR
    Brownsville Reso - 101 Electric Reso : Fender GDO-300 Maple Quilt Top Acoustic

    Amps: Fender Super Champ XD

    Effects: Digitech RP250 Modeling Guitar Processor : DVM "Phased and Confused" Script Phaser Clone : Digitech Bad Monkey
    Danelectro Cool Cat Chorus : Behringer Distortion Modeler : Ernie Ball Volume Pedal : Dunlop Cry Baby Wah

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My 2 cents...

    Teles are beautiful guitars. Like others have said: simplicity is the source of this beauty.
    I have to say though, I dont like variations on the original design. Different pickup configurations, different bridges and rosewood fretboards all take something away it IMO.

    Also, like I have said in the other thread, ugly for me is those disgusting, big, angular things like B.C. Rich, Washburn Dimebags, Gibson Explorers and the like.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tone E
    Also, like I have said in the other thread, ugly for me is those disgusting, big, angular things like B.C. Rich, Washburn Dimebags, Gibson Explorers and the like.
    Quote Originally Posted by tjcurtin1
    I agree with Tone E about the guitars I'd class as UGLY -
    I have to agree with that. I know there a lot of people that like them, but I'm a more traditional style.

    I guess the hammer theory would apply to those too.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •