Results 1 to 19 of 115

Thread: Tele - Ugly or Beautiful?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    49
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My 2 cents...

    Teles are beautiful guitars. Like others have said: simplicity is the source of this beauty.
    I have to say though, I dont like variations on the original design. Different pickup configurations, different bridges and rosewood fretboards all take something away it IMO.

    Also, like I have said in the other thread, ugly for me is those disgusting, big, angular things like B.C. Rich, Washburn Dimebags, Gibson Explorers and the like.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio - Near Cleveland - Home of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame http://www.rockhall.com/
    Posts
    7,753
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tone E
    Also, like I have said in the other thread, ugly for me is those disgusting, big, angular things like B.C. Rich, Washburn Dimebags, Gibson Explorers and the like.
    Quote Originally Posted by tjcurtin1
    I agree with Tone E about the guitars I'd class as UGLY -
    I have to agree with that. I know there a lot of people that like them, but I'm a more traditional style.

    I guess the hammer theory would apply to those too.
    Mark
    * Loud is good, good is better!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •