Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Dean Markley Vs. Seymour Duncan Woody

  1. #1
    pes_laul Guest

    Default Dean Markley Vs. Seymour Duncan Woody

    So I've been playing my Seagull for a while now and I have a show in a month my band is playing and I play an acoustic on a handful. While I could get mic'd, that would be a huge pain because we're supplying everything but the PA. I'm looking at these two and I'd like to know which you prefer. My dad has the Dean markley for his 12 string which sounds good but harsh at times.

    If you know of any other ones to consider in this price range let me know.

    Thanks,
    -Kris

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    3,424
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23

    Default

    I also had the Dean Markley for my 12-string and it was OK but hardly very acoustic-sounding. It works much better in a friend's 6-string now, but it's a compromise, not quite semiacoustic-feeling but not purely like an acoustic either. Nice for blues, though.

    I put a Fishman transducer on my guitar (under the bridge bone) and it was rather easy to install after all with very basic tools, almost just a knife, a couple of drill bits/battery drill and some sandpaper - just need to work carefully - and it worked very well for acoustic tone. The only drawback is you really need to watch your right hand slapping the bridge with these piezo things. Plus attaching the preamp was difficult/can require a lot more work and cutting depending on the model.
    Dee

    "When life's a biatch, be a horny dog"

    Amps: Marshall JVM 410H w/ Plexi Cap mod, Choke Mod & Negative Feedback Removal mod, 4x12", Behringer GMX110, Amplitube 3/StealthPedal

    Half a dozen custom built/bastardized guitars all with EMG's, mostly 85's, Ibanez Artwood acoustic & Yamaha SGR bass, Epiphone Prophecy SG, Vox Wah, Pitchblack tuner plus assorted pedals, rack gear etc. for home studio use.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Pes,
    Which Markley and which Duncan Woody? I'm pretty familiar with them.

    I'm guessing you're asking about one of Markley's ProMags, since they look a lot like the Duncan Woody? Dean Markley ProMag Series
    Maybe your dad has the single coil model...the 'harsh' sound coul be its natural tendency to be glassy in the high-mids and high end without compensating the eq of the preamp (even if only a pa or amp channnel) it's going into.

    Regardless, I find all the Markley's can be shrill or glassy and hard to compensate for compared to the Duncans. There's less tendency for that glassiness with one of the Duncan woody's...
    Duncan Acoustic PUPS

    I opted years ago to go with this Duncan instead of the Woody in my Guild D40; it's a humbucker soundhole pup with a volume control...actually handy to cut the signal back some, kinda like coil-tapping (not really, but kinda) and 'thin' it out vs. working it as a volume control:
    Duncan Acoustitube

    With any of these: know your Seagull's soundhole diameter first and note the spacing suggested on the mfr's websites, or bring your guitar with you to the store you're looking to score from. My Guild's got a relatively narrow soundhole, and it's not that easy to be taking the Acoustitube in & out; I put it in and leave it for....months. If the soundhole were bigger, it would be less of an issue.

    Also, I've always used an outboard preamp eq of some sort. You really need this kind of control at your fingertips in a live setting. Relying on the soundman to fix your tone is asking for a stick in the eye. The more eq control the better. It can be as simple as something like a Boss 7-band eq pedal, to the best & most versatile I've found, $ for $, an LR Baggs ParaAcoustic DI.
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In The Middle Of The Arrpeggio
    Posts
    1,395
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Great post WD.....I had one of the Woody's when I had the Washburn D10S back in 2005/2006 before I stupidly sold it.....man that was a great dread.

    I did not care for the woody so I took it back to GC under the 30 days no questions asked return policy. It could have been my crappy playing...but it just did not sound acoustic to my ears....it sounded very tinny and artificial....could also have been that I was using the clean channel on the Peavey Bandit 112 with volume down low.....but I did find that the next couple of acoustic electrics I played through it sounded very good.

    Worst thing worse Pes.....take your guitar and amp with you to a GC and try it out in their Acoustic room......just make sure you do so before your gig.

    I would probably go the mic'd route myself.
    Guitars: 2002 Les Paul Studio Limited Color's Edition | 2004 Greg Bennett Avion Les Paul Copy | S101 Telecaster project | 2004 Washburn D46 Acoustic

    Amplification: Epiphone Valve Jr. Head and Cabinet | VOX AD30VT

    Effects: Rocktron Delay | BBE Free Fuzz | Big Muff Pi | Boss Flanger | Bad Monkey | Jekyll and Hyde | Cry Baby Wah | Boss EQ | Behrenger TU300 Tuner |



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    1,267
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I've only had the Dean Markley. It is cheap and does an alright job. I think it would work well in a band setup since it isn't the only instrument playing. I'd say that the Duncan is a better pickup just due to it's reputation. But if you've already got a Dean Markley I'd just stick with it and spend a little extra time during sound check adjusting the EQ to get the best sound out of it.
    Patrick

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    797
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I have a Dean Markely Tahoe mounted in my Dean 00R. I have only played it out a few times, but was pretty pleased with the sound the few times I did. I have also used a Duncan woody in my Guild and was not so thrilled. I agree with Wings assesment. A bit shrill, glassy and thin sounding.

    If you are open to another option I'd suggest at least considering a K&K western. I have installed these in several guitars and am a big fan.

    I'll also second the EQ comment from Wings. A preamp/E.Q. will make a very big difference.
    "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic
    hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs.
    There's also a negative side."
    --Hunter S. Thompson

    Guitars: Dean Sweet Wood 00R, Martin D2R, Guild D60, Guild D35NT, Morgan Monroe M30, OS baritone Uke

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South Williamsport, Pa. (on the Susquehanna River)
    Posts
    777
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Pickup Promag Grand

    I have a permanently mounted Dean Markley Promag Grand with tail pin jack on my Seagull w spruce top and flammed maple sides and back. It is an awesome pickup, humbucking and it sounds great thru a regular guitar amp, which is something I have not found other acoustic pickups to do, especially thru my Fender SCXD.

    Highly recommended.

    Duffy
    Duffy
    South Williamsport, Pa.

    "So let us stop talking falsely now, the hour's getting late." (as by JH)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •