Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 19 of 28

Thread: Idea for modelers: keep it simple

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    MSP
    Posts
    3,913
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Idea for modelers: keep it simple

    I burned some time last night by going to Guitar Center for about 20 minutes and very briefly tried a Spider IV while there. I didn't have much time to mess around on it, but as has happened before, I found myself kind of overwhelmed by the number of settings.

    After thinking about it some more, I came up with a question: why don't these modelling amps ever just target one famous tube-y sound and do their best to nail it with DSP? I can think of a few amps right off the bat that would probably be good targets (AC30, Blues Jr., etc.), and while they might be limited with a 1 x 12", they could tone down the interface and just nail that one amp.

    The issue I inevitably have with modellers is that tweaking is required to really find a sweet spot, and if you don't know what you're doing, the amps might sound like ***. Seems to me a company like Line 6 could just copy a simplistic interface of a tube amp, get the EQ and gain calibrated, and have an amp that sounded and behaved like the thing it's modelling.

    Any thoughts on why they don't do this? Such an amp undoubtedly would not be as popular with 13-year-olds, but I imagine it might turn some heads in the tube-amp/pedal-board crowd.

    Side note: I know Tech 21 is doing something like this with the character series, but they're still trying to cut a somewhat wide swath (e.g. Mark through Dual Rectifier with the California), and it's just a pedal, not an entire amp.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudman
    Does anyone read the original post?
    Guitars: Gibson LP Studio, MIA Fender Precision, Carvin C350
    Amps: Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Avatar B212 / Genzler 12-3, Acoustic B20
    Pedals: Pod HD500X, Diamond Compressor, Tech 21 VT Bass, Sonic Research Turbo Tuner

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    There will never be a simple modelling box for the same reason there will never be a simple digital camera (Leica M8/9 excepted). Manufacturers need to keep the feature count high to try to please all potential users and score points in reviews.

    Me, I'd go for a box that gave me compressor/boost, Tube Screamer, Rat, a couple of modulations (these could be selected from a range) and a good sounding tap tempo delay with a Fender Deluxe model at the end of the chain. Make them all independently selected and offer the ability to turn off the amp modelling for when you need to use backline for monitoring. The trouble is that this selection wouldn't be everyone's idea of the perfect world. So, "all things to all men" is what you get, it's up to you to select what to use. A sign of our marketing driven times sadly.
    Electric: Fat strat > Korg PB > TS7 > DS1 > DD-20 > Cube 60 (Fender model)

    Acoustic: Guitar > microphone > audience

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    1,267
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Modeling amps are made to give the player variety. If you wanted the sound of a Vox you would buy a Vox. You buy a modeling amp because you aren't content with just one sound. If you are looking for a more straight ahead modeling amp I would ignore the Line 6 and look at a Tech 21. No digital displays to be found.
    Patrick

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    283
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I, my self, am torn on the issue...
    On one hand, I agree with Eric, simple - dial up a Marshall JTM45 or JCM800/900 and that's what the amp sounds like...
    On the other hand, I agree with hubberjub, if you want a JCM, buy a JCM...

    But the bigger issue that I think Eric is getting at is price, negating hubberjub's point, what normal, non-pro/non-wealthy person can aford all the the amps and guitars we want, right!? Modelers are inexpensive and made that way to get the most buyers possible while still making a quality product. A perfect example (there are many over the years) of a great idea without the follow-thru on total quality; the Crate V5 amp... Solid cabinet build, excellent choice of speaker size... Horrible speaker, bad circuit design (op amp distortion, no volume control).

    As for the reccomendation of a Tech 21 over Line 6 ... All the way, bro, complete agreement there. Can't aford Tech 21, try Behringer GMX amps (though I don't like Jensen OEM speakers)... yeah, yeah, I know, digital effects, but analog "amp modeling".
    "...and I am outta here!"
    Scott

    Guitars:
    Dean EVO Exotic Burl, EVO Special, Vendetta 1000 FR, Stagg Les Paul copy, Squier Standard Telecaster, Squier MIK Stratocaster
    Amps:
    Fender Princeton 65 (solid state), Vox AD15VT, Peavey Windsor Studio, Crate Vintage Club 50 2x12
    Pedals:
    DOD FX40B (x2), FX50, FX52, FX55, FX65, FX67, FX80
    Washburn LSESLD, LSBOD
    BBE Free Fuzz
    Behringer EM300, VP1, PH9
    Dunlop GCB-95
    ProCo Rat II "The Rat"
    DigiTech Bad Monkey, RP90
    Rockman Soloist
    and many, many, many more!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Takoma Park, MD
    Posts
    420
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Actually, I think this is exactly what Vox is doing with the AC30VR and AC15VR.
    "When I play, I express my feelings very fast." -Yomo Toro

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    MSP
    Posts
    3,913
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeanEVO_Dude
    But the bigger issue that I think Eric is getting at is price, negating hubberjub's point, what normal, non-pro/non-wealthy person can afford all the the amps and guitars we want, right!? Modelers are inexpensive and made that way to get the most buyers possible while still making a quality product.
    Yup, that's exactly my point. Well, kind of. I mean, modelling amps are less expensive than the real deal, so why not tone down the interface and do a decent clone of a more expensive amp? Also, digital and/or analog SS amps don't tend to be as heavy or maintenance-intensive as tubes.

    Right now, modellers tend to only snag the people who don't know what they want. I think that with a different approach, these companies could snag a whole new segment of players. Goodness knows Line 6 has repackaged the Pod enough times -- seems like another product wouldn't kill them.

    This isn't a question for what I should buy. It's just a concept that I was curious why nobody has tried.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudman
    Does anyone read the original post?
    Guitars: Gibson LP Studio, MIA Fender Precision, Carvin C350
    Amps: Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Avatar B212 / Genzler 12-3, Acoustic B20
    Pedals: Pod HD500X, Diamond Compressor, Tech 21 VT Bass, Sonic Research Turbo Tuner

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,298
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hubberjub
    Modeling amps are made to give the player variety. If you wanted the sound of a Vox you would buy a Vox.
    All said with that quote.
    "A lot of people in the industry want to blame downloading for the state of the business. But I think if most music wasn't shit to begin with people wouldn't be downloading it for free," - Corey Taylor (Slipknot)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric
    Seems to me a company like Line 6 could just copy a simplistic interface of a tube amp, get the EQ and gain calibrated, and have an amp that sounded and behaved like the thing it's modelling.
    Which is exactly what they did with the Line 6 Spider Valve MkII.
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    High & Dry, Southern California
    Posts
    1,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Actually, Eric, now that you recently became The Fret's 3rd Musketeer of the Esteemed Order of the Tech21 Trademark 60 1x12, you have an amp that comes close to that, at least in design principle.

    No, not just a single amp 'model', but you have a 'Fender' Channel 1 and a 'Brit' Channel 2, each with their 'range' of amps of that nature. Yeah, you don't scroll thru a display window or click a selector to a setting with cryptic names for them, but you dial in an amp's 'character' by locating a mix of analog control knobs & a couple of buttons, using either the manual's sample settings or twiddling & using your ears.

    Musketeer Numero Uno, markb Do I, Muskeeteer Dos, have this about right?

    (Eric: I realize you already know this; I'm just reiterating the amp's concept for those who may not have actually tried one.)
    ^^
    AXES: Fender '81 The STRAT, '12 Standard Tele, '78 Musicmaster Bass, '13 CN-240SCE Thinline; Rickenbacker '82 360-12BWB; Epiphone '05 Casino, '08 John Lennon EJ-160E; Guild '70 D-40NT; Ovation '99 Celebrity CS-257; Yamaha '96 FG411CE-12; Washburn '05 M6SW Mando, '08 Oscar Schmidt OU250Bell Uke; Johnson '96 JR-200-SB Squareneck Reso; Hofner '07 Icon B-Bass; Ibanez '12 AR-325. AMPS: Tech 21 Trademark 10; Peavey ValveKing Royal 8; Fender Acoustonic 90, Passport Mini, Mini Tonemaster; Marshall MS-2 Micro Stack; Behringer BX-108 Thunderbird; Tom Scholz Rockman. PEDALS/FX: Boss ME-50; Yamaha EMP100; Stage DE-1; Samson C-Com 16 L.R. Baggs ParaAcoustic D.I; MXR EQ-10.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    MSP
    Posts
    3,913
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wingsdad
    Actually, Eric, now that you recently became The Fret's 3rd Musketeer of the Esteemed Order of the Tech21 Trademark 60 1x12, you have an amp that comes close to that, at least in design principle.

    No, not just a single amp 'model', but you have a 'Fender' Channel 1 and a 'Brit' Channel 2, each with their 'range' of amps of that nature. Yeah, you don't scroll thru a display window or click a selector to a setting with cryptic names for them, but you dial in an amp's 'character' by locating a mix of analog control knobs & a couple of buttons, using either the manual's sample settings or twiddling & using your ears.

    Musketeer Numero Uno, markb Do I, Muskeeteer Dos, have this about right?

    (Eric: I realize you already know this; I'm just reiterating the amp's concept for those who may not have actually tried one.)
    It's true that the TM60 is pretty simple. I like Tech 21 stuff for a few reasons: they're straightforward, they work and sound good, and they don't tend to be too gimmicky.

    I think that when the manufacturing cost is so low, as with many of these Line 6 digital amps, the companies can't help themselves and end up cramming in every model they can. In some senses that's good, but it also makes it a little less user-friendly and you also end up with a lot of models and tones you never touch.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudman
    Does anyone read the original post?
    Guitars: Gibson LP Studio, MIA Fender Precision, Carvin C350
    Amps: Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Avatar B212 / Genzler 12-3, Acoustic B20
    Pedals: Pod HD500X, Diamond Compressor, Tech 21 VT Bass, Sonic Research Turbo Tuner

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    A wee bit west of Boston
    Posts
    892
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Here is an idea:

    Why don't we, at TheFret, commission a modeller to our own specs, just few amp models, handful of effects, simple, classic interface.

    You know, with modern manufacturing, the Chinese are adept at producing prototype units (clothing, electronics) within days, or so I read. Then, it is a matter of another month to get production parts going.

    Sold by subscription. Anybody with seed money?
    Less golf, more saxophone

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poodlesrule
    Here is an idea:

    Why don't we, at TheFret, commission a modeller to our own specs, just few amp models, handful of effects, simple, classic interface.

    You know, with modern manufacturing, the Chinese are adept at producing prototype units (clothing, electronics) within days, or so I read. Then, it is a matter of another month to get production parts going.

    Sold by subscription. Anybody with seed money?
    Hardware is cheap. Who's going to create the models? Shall we just steal them in a kind of Web 2.0 hipster way?
    Electric: Fat strat > Korg PB > TS7 > DS1 > DD-20 > Cube 60 (Fender model)

    Acoustic: Guitar > microphone > audience

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    MSP
    Posts
    3,913
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markb
    Hardware is cheap. Who's going to create the models? Shall we just steal them in a kind of Web 2.0 hipster way?
    Well that's the problem, isn't it? I figure we could just feed this idea to a Line 6 marketing exec and they'd have a new product line out in a couple of weeks...

    I will say this much for L6: they sure do get the most out of the models they create. For that reason alone, I think your initial assertion of variety and widespread appeal may trump my idea of a streamlined single-model amp, at least for a while.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudman
    Does anyone read the original post?
    Guitars: Gibson LP Studio, MIA Fender Precision, Carvin C350
    Amps: Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Avatar B212 / Genzler 12-3, Acoustic B20
    Pedals: Pod HD500X, Diamond Compressor, Tech 21 VT Bass, Sonic Research Turbo Tuner

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    283
    Post Thanks / Like

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric
    Yup, that's exactly my point. Well, kind of. I mean, modelling amps are less expensive than the real deal, so why not tone down the interface and do a decent clone of a more expensive amp? Also, digital and/or analog SS amps don't tend to be as heavy or maintenance-intensive as tubes.

    Right now, modellers tend to only snag the people who don't know what they want. I think that with a different approach, these companies could snag a whole new segment of players. Goodness knows Line 6 has repackaged the Pod enough times -- seems like another product wouldn't kill them.

    This isn't a question for what I should buy. It's just a concept that I was curious why nobody has tried.
    I agree, one of the problems with modelers is that they go for the lower price point in most cases. Face it, if you don't have a 4x12 or two, you can't really get the sound of an amp that has a 4x12 cab, hard (if not impossible) to emulate. I think that the ideal would be a modeling amp head, with several selections for cabs (1x12, 2x12, 4x10, 4x12, etc.) available, as "ideal" as that concept could be... I kinda covers all (or most) famous/historic amps that are modeled by them (maybe I should patent that idea LOL). Surely, you cannot make an 8" speaker sound like a 2x12 Blue equiped Vox AC30TB, right!?

    I just remembered that Randall had an amp with swapable pre amp modules, thinking back, that seems like the first "modeling" amp I can remeber. But, what about the output tube sound, i.e. 6L6 vs EL34 vs 6550... They all have a different sound, right?

    So, I guess the botom line is, hard to make a "one-amp-fits-all" modeler. As for the reccomendation on "what to buy," it wasn't necessarilly that, but there are some simple modelers out there, like the Behringer GMX210/212 or the Tech 21 Trademark series, they just don't say "Tweed Deluxe" or "JCM800" or "Tripple Recto" on the settings. Maybe too simple on those?
    "...and I am outta here!"
    Scott

    Guitars:
    Dean EVO Exotic Burl, EVO Special, Vendetta 1000 FR, Stagg Les Paul copy, Squier Standard Telecaster, Squier MIK Stratocaster
    Amps:
    Fender Princeton 65 (solid state), Vox AD15VT, Peavey Windsor Studio, Crate Vintage Club 50 2x12
    Pedals:
    DOD FX40B (x2), FX50, FX52, FX55, FX65, FX67, FX80
    Washburn LSESLD, LSBOD
    BBE Free Fuzz
    Behringer EM300, VP1, PH9
    Dunlop GCB-95
    ProCo Rat II "The Rat"
    DigiTech Bad Monkey, RP90
    Rockman Soloist
    and many, many, many more!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    3,424
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by markb
    Me, I'd go for a box that gave me compressor/boost, Tube Screamer, Rat, a couple of modulations (these could be selected from a range) and a good sounding tap tempo delay with a Fender Deluxe model at the end of the chain.
    You know, that's pretty close to Boss GT series boxes. I had the GT-6 and while it didn't have a Deluxe model per se, it pretty much gave what you described anyhow.

    Anyway, as for Eric's suggestion - that's what I dislike about most modelers. They are way too complex, and to top it all off the sounds are built so that there is no actual working 'base' sound but it's all about interwoven FX that create the sound or model acting in cooperation.

    That yields to problems to me: first, while a given sound may be excellent for one song or song part, in another part or song it may not work because of some little detail, and that leads to constant tweaking.

    Secondly, I want to record my guitars totally dry no FX at all, and in most cases when you strip a modeled sound of all FX it no longer sounds anything like the amp modeled because the sound is built by layering, not based on a great actual model that would work great alone.

    That's why I too like simple 'modelers' like Tech21 and such.

    Well I'll see how I find the Vox I just swapped my TM10 for...picking it up today...
    Dee

    "When life's a biatch, be a horny dog"

    Amps: Marshall JVM 410H w/ Plexi Cap mod, Choke Mod & Negative Feedback Removal mod, 4x12", Behringer GMX110, Amplitube 3/StealthPedal

    Half a dozen custom built/bastardized guitars all with EMG's, mostly 85's, Ibanez Artwood acoustic & Yamaha SGR bass, Epiphone Prophecy SG, Vox Wah, Pitchblack tuner plus assorted pedals, rack gear etc. for home studio use.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Camrose, Alberta, Canada - used to be Umea Sweden.
    Posts
    12,854
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    The Line 6 M9 and M13 are very simple to use, even though they have so many sounds in it. I would rather have one of these, than a unit that costs half as much but only has a 10th of the number good sounds that the M9/M13 have.
    The Law of Gravity is nonsense. No such law exists. If I think I float, and you think I float, then it happens.
    Master Guitar Academy - I also teach via SKYPE.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    2,353
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deeaa
    You know, that's pretty close to Boss GT series boxes. I had the GT-6 and while it didn't have a Deluxe model per se, it pretty much gave what you described anyhow.
    Close, but no cigar for the GT series. Great, flexible outputs, etc, etc, but they take ages tweaking to get right.

    I'm starting to think the Digitech RP500 is my favourite implementation at present. It's a modeller and it's a box full of pedalboards. It's even got a quick setup mode and you can turn the modelling on and off globally.
    Electric: Fat strat > Korg PB > TS7 > DS1 > DD-20 > Cube 60 (Fender model)

    Acoustic: Guitar > microphone > audience

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    MSP
    Posts
    3,913
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deeaa
    You know, that's pretty close to Boss GT series boxes. I had the GT-6 and while it didn't have a Deluxe model per se, it pretty much gave what you described anyhow.
    Seriously?? I borrowed a friend's GT-6 once and it was the board that made me hate modellers -- tweak city.

    I guess my point can be summed up by stompboxes: people still like to use them because they know what they do, how they behave, and they are individual units. Something about having a bunch of pedals, amp, and guitar is easier for brains to understand than when it's all rolled into one big amp or board. That's what's easiest for my head to understand too.

    I learned when I was younger that if I bought one CD, I would play the crap out of it until I knew it inside-out. If I bought 2 (or definitely if I bought 3), there would be one disc in there I would never really fully explore. I think my brain works the same way with guitar stuff.

    I hope some of this made sense. I've felt like I can't really communicate well recently.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudman
    Does anyone read the original post?
    Guitars: Gibson LP Studio, MIA Fender Precision, Carvin C350
    Amps: Genz Benz Shuttle 6.0 + Avatar B212 / Genzler 12-3, Acoustic B20
    Pedals: Pod HD500X, Diamond Compressor, Tech 21 VT Bass, Sonic Research Turbo Tuner

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    3,424
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    23

    Default

    Oh yeah, I guess they are quite complex to tweak...didn't really think of that aspect. Just what they offer in FX etc.
    Dee

    "When life's a biatch, be a horny dog"

    Amps: Marshall JVM 410H w/ Plexi Cap mod, Choke Mod & Negative Feedback Removal mod, 4x12", Behringer GMX110, Amplitube 3/StealthPedal

    Half a dozen custom built/bastardized guitars all with EMG's, mostly 85's, Ibanez Artwood acoustic & Yamaha SGR bass, Epiphone Prophecy SG, Vox Wah, Pitchblack tuner plus assorted pedals, rack gear etc. for home studio use.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •