Results 1 to 19 of 22

Thread: fretters' opinions on marshall MGs?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    827
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ibanezjunkie
    problem is, most of the videos are secretly utillising an EQ and/or distortion pedal. i played an mg a while back, the drive channel is weak and muddy, and you cant really get much midrange.

    the cleans are alright, but yet again they lack definition and mid and low range frequencies.

    buy why get an MG when you can get a valve junior, vypyr, cube, peavey nano, H&L edition blue...etc.
    I think the Marshall MG series is marketed for those folks who want a Marshall stack but can't afford the tube versions; much like the Fender Frontman. They are pretty much entry level amps. I owned an MG100 Head and didn't like the tones at all and wound up selling it, but again, I think we have to keep it in perspective that it's an entry level amp and isn't going to sound as good as a "real" marshall (Plexi, JCM 800).

    There's obviously a market out there for amps like the MG series, Frontman amps, etc. I remember my first few amps being Fender solid states.
    Guitars: 2003 and 2004 American series strats, Squier Classic Vibe 50's Strat, Squier Deluxe Strat.

    Amps: Line 6 Spider IV 120, Vox AD50VT 212, and Peavey Transtube Bandit 112.

    Pedals: Digitech Bad Monkey.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,515
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    My $399 Windsor 100 watt tubed halfstack will make those overpriced MGs cry.

    _____

    GUITARS - Carvin DC127M - Carvin Bolt kit
    AMPS - Bogner Alchemist 112 - Blackheart Handsome Devil half stack
    FXs - Roger Linn Adrenalinn III - Boss GT-10
    _____

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •